Studies from various disasters suggest that the current system of disaster recovery neglects those most in need of assistance. With the impacts of climate change already being felt, it’s time to reassess how we respond disasters.
While integrating response and continuity plans seems logical, it can be very difficult without a well-thought out process.
A war thousands of miles away may not seem to be a problem to local emergency managers but the consequences can hit close to home.
Misperceptions and misunderstanding can lead to a conflict between business continuity and emergency management? Which should take the lead?
Emergency managers tend to focus inward on their communities, but what if the threat originates thousands of miles away? Will you see it coming?
Good emergency planning involves the participation of many stakeholders. But who should be involved and how do you keep the planning process from bogging down?
The four phases of comprehensive emergency management form the basis of modern emergency management. But does including the concept in your emergency plan make it a candidate for failure?
An effective emergency plan is written with the end user in mind, not to meet arbitrary requirements.
Ignoring basic concepts can make your plan unusable in a crisis. Simple changes in perspective can make the difference between success and failure.
Applying a simple emergency management concept can make your plan more effective.