Political Economics and Emergency Management
The study of political economics is not normally considered a field of study for emergency managers, but it has a direct bearing on disaster vulnerability and recovery.
The study of political economics is not normally considered a field of study for emergency managers, but it has a direct bearing on disaster vulnerability and recovery.
Many private sector organizations adopt the Incident Command System for use by their incident management team but is it really the best way to manage a crisis?
Studies from various disasters suggest that the current system of disaster recovery neglects those most in need of assistance. With the impacts of climate change already being felt, it’s time to reassess how we respond disasters.
While integrating response and continuity plans seems logical, it can be very difficult without a well-thought out process.
A war thousands of miles away may not seem to be a problem to local emergency managers but the consequences can hit close to home.
Misperceptions and misunderstanding can lead to a conflict between business continuity and emergency management? Which should take the lead?
Emergency managers tend to focus inward on their communities, but what if the threat originates thousands of miles away? Will you see it coming?
Good emergency planning involves the participation of many stakeholders. But who should be involved and how do you keep the planning process from bogging down?
The four phases of comprehensive emergency management form the basis of modern emergency management. But does including the concept in your emergency plan make it a candidate for failure?
An effective emergency plan is written with the end user in mind, not to meet arbitrary requirements.